|
|
|

STERILIZATION
AMONG ROMAN CATHOLIC WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES |
Why do they do it, and how can this be changed?
Female sterilization is the second most frequently used
method of family planning among women between the ages of
15-44 in the United States. If you include the use of
sterilization of the male partner in the equation, then
sterilization becomes the number one method of family
planning in the US, even exceeding the use of oral
contraception. The pattern of sterilization use among Roman
Catholic (RC) women in the US is not much different than the
total population of US women. According to the data from the
2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), the rate of
ever use of female sterilization among US women was 15% and
among RC-US women 14%, whereas male partner sterilization
among US women and US-RC women was about 4%.
In 2002, researchers form Marquette University analyzed
trends in contraception use among RC-US women (using NSFG
data) and found that from 1988 to 1995 the ever use of
sterilization almost doubled. Marquette researchers recently
analyzed the influence of religiosity on the use of
contraception among US-RC women based on the data from the
latest (2002 – Cycle 6)) NSFG. ….
What is startling in these findings is that RC women who
have frequent church attendance and who view their religion
as very important had more frequent (38-69%) “ever use” of
female sterilization. The use of sterilization might reflect
the completion of the family size, an older population of
women, and the decline of female fertility as women reach
the age of 35-40. Women in this age range no longer wish to
be using hormonal contraception and are probably tired of
managing their fertility. Women at this age are also often
confused by irregular cycles and are fearful of an unwanted
pregnancy in this stage of their life.
One reason that RC women who have frequent church attendance
and believe that their religion is very important had more
frequent use of sterilization could be because sterilization
is a one-time event. Couples can have the sterilization
surgery, confess to a priest, and then be back in the grace
of God and the church. The constant use of the pill and/or
condoms, on the other hand, requires either frequent
confession or a guilty conscience. The sterilization and
one-time forgiveness process was first speculated by Leslie
Woodcock Tentler in her book Catholics and Contraception; an
American History.
Another reason for the use of sterilization among Catholic
couples might be a lack of understanding of the Church’s
teaching on family planning and sexual ethics. This reason
is somewhat supported by findings showing that the subset of
women with orthodox sexual ethics did not have a higher
frequency of male (partner) or female sterilization. So too
others have pointed out that there is an ignorance of the
tenets of the faith system and/or a rejection of the Church
teaching on moral issues altogether. Another possible reason
is that, although RC couples know the Church’s teachings on
contraception and sterilization, they view themselves as
“autonomous” adults, and downplay or ignore the role of the
church’s official teachings in forming their consciences on
the issue of family planning.
Although there seems to be some influence of religion on the
family planning choices of RC women, it is still quite
apparent that RC women (and men) have difficulty in either
living with or accepting their fertility and that of their
spouse. This is evident from the fact that their most
frequent ways of dealing with fertility are to either
suppress it with hormones or destroy it with surgery.
Another implication is that although women and couples view
their faith as very important, they may not have a good
understanding of the faith and what it teaches, especially
in the area of sexuality and contraception. This is further
exacerbated by the lack of support from clergy and Catholic
health professionals and Catholic health institutions in the
area of family planning. Relatively few physicians,
professional nurses, nurse midwives, and Catholic health
facilities offer and promote the use of NFP.
The findings of this study are encouraging in that there is
a higher use of NFP in women who attend church services
frequently and in those who report religion as very
important, but discouraging that there is also a frequent
use of surgical sterilization among this same group. This
would seem to indicate a need for better catechesis, perhaps
at a younger age, for Catholic men and women. However,
further research would be helpful. In determining whether
religious beliefs enter into the decision of women who are
choosing a method of family planning at all.
Another factor that might hold more influence in a woman’s
or couple’s contraception decision making is the effects of
sterilization on health and/or the marital and conjugal
relationship. A recent study showed that women who have been
sterilized had a greater likelihood or reporting that stress
was interfering with sex and to have seen a physician for
sexual problems. The autthors of this study speculated that
somehow sterilization is interfering with the emotional bond
between the partners. So too there is speculation that
sterilization disrupts the woman’s self-esteem and body
image, i.e., feeling less feminine and less a woman.
Discussing these dynamics with physicians and other health
professionals before a woman (or man) is sterilized would be
important. In conjunction with discussing the possible
effects of sterilization on the marital relationship is a
discussion of God’s true design for marriage, the Theology
of the Body, and strategies for living with one’s fertility.
Hopefully, this would lead more women to reconsider
sterilization and develop a newfound interest in living with
fertility in accordance with God’s plan.
(Reprinted with permission from Current Medical Research
Summer/Fall 2007, Vol. 20, Nos 3&4, pp. 18-21, DDP/NFP,
USCCB, Washington, DC. E-mail: nfp@usccb.org.)
Cordially yours,
Fr. Matthew Habiger OSB www.nfpoutreach.org
- back to
Q & A --
|
|